Distro Transparency Index (DTI)
Mageia
DTI Score: 70.59/100
1. Governance Transparency (3/3 points)
- Availability of governance documents: Yes (1 point)
- Detail of governance documents: Detailed (2 points)
- Mageia Constitution
2. Decision Making Transparency (2/3 points)
- Documented decision-making process: Yes (1 point)
- Accessibility of meeting minutes: Partial (1 point) (not regularly updated)
- Mageia Board Meetings
3. Economic Transparency (0/4 points)
- Publication of financial statements: Not published (0 points)
- Detail of financial statements: Minimal (0 points)
4. Economic Accessibility (0/4 points)
- Access to financial reports: Not available (0 points)
- Ease of access: Difficult (0 points)
5. Source Code Accessibility (4/4 points)
- Availability of source code: Public (2 points)
- Ease of access to source code: Easy (2 points)
- Mageia GitHub
6. Public Roadmap Availability (2/3 points)
- Public roadmap: Yes (1 point)
- Detail of roadmap: Partial (1 point)
- Mageia Development Roadmap
7. Transparency in Code Review Processes (3/3 points)
- Documentation of review processes: Yes (1 point)
- Transparency of review processes: High (2 points)
- Mageia Developer Documentation
8. Community Participation in Development (4/4 points)
- Number of active contributors: High (2 points)
- Accessibility to development processes: Easy (2 points)
- Mageia Contributors Guide
9. Impact of Governance Structure on Transparency (6/6 points)
- Centralization of decision-making power: Decentralized (2 points)
- Control and balance mechanisms: Strong (2 points)
- Influence of commercial entities on governance: Minimal (2 points)
- Mageia Constitution
Strengths:
- Excellent governance transparency with detailed documentation.
- Great source code accessibility with a public and easy-to-navigate repository.
- Strong community participation in development and decision-making.
- Decentralized governance structure minimizing commercial influence.
Areas for Improvement:
- Economic transparency: No publication of financial statements and financial information is not easily accessible.
- Detail of roadmap and meeting updates: The roadmap could be more detailed, and meetings should be updated more frequently to better reflect future plans.
Conclusion:
Mageia Linux shows a high level of transparency in governance and development processes, positioning itself as a highly accessible and collaborative open-source project. With improvements in economic transparency and more frequent updates to meetings, Mageia could further strengthen its position as an example of good practices in the open-source community.