Elementary OS

DTI Score: 47.06/100 👥🟡 🏛️🔴 💰🔴 💻🟢 ✉️🟡

Detailed Evaluation

1. Governance Transparency: 0/3

Availability of governance documents: Partial (0 points)
Detail of governance documents: Minimal (0 points)
Source: elementary OS GitHub
Note: While some information is available, there's no comprehensive governance document. The governance structure is not explicitly detailed in official documents.

2. Decision Making Transparency: 0/3

Documented decision-making process: Partial (0 points)
Accessibility of meeting minutes: Not Available (0 points)
Source: elementary Blog
Note: Decision-making processes are sometimes discussed in blog posts, but not formally documented. Formal meeting minutes are not publicly available.

3. Economic Transparency: 0/4

Publication of financial statements: Not Available (0 points)
Detail of financial statements: Not Available (0 points)
Source: No specific transparency page found
Note: After thorough review, no comprehensive financial information or statements were found publicly available.

4. Economic Accessibility: 0/4

Access to financial reports: Not Available (0 points)
Ease of access: Difficult (0 points)
Note: Detailed financial information is not publicly accessible.

5. Source Code Accessibility: 4/4

Availability of source code: Public (2 points)
Ease of access to source code: Easy (2 points)
Source: elementary GitHub
Note: The source code is easily accessible through GitHub repositories.

6. Public Roadmap Availability: 0/3

Public roadmap: Partial (0 points)
Detail of roadmap: Minimal (0 points)
Source: elementary OS Releases
Note: Release information is available, but there's no formal long-term roadmap. Long-term development goals are not clearly outlined.

7. Transparency in Code Review Processes: 3/3

Documentation of review processes: Yes (1 point)
Transparency of review processes: High (2 points)
Source: elementary Developer Guide
Note: Code review processes are public and can be observed on GitHub pull requests.

8. Community Participation in Development: 4/4

Number of active contributors: High (2 points)
Accessibility to development processes: Easy (2 points)
Source: elementary GitHub Contributors
Note: elementary OS provides comprehensive documentation for contributors and encourages participation.

9. Impact of Governance Structure on Transparency: 3/6

Centralization of decision-making power: Partially centralized (1 point)
Control and balance mechanisms: Moderate (1 point)
Influence of commercial entities on governance: Moderate (1 point)
Note: While community input is valued, key decisions seem to be made by a core team. Some control mechanisms exist through open-source practices, but formal structures are not clearly defined. elementary, Inc. has influence, but the project maintains open-source principles.

Concluding Analysis

elementary OS demonstrates varying levels of transparency and accessibility across the evaluated areas:

Strengths:

Excellent accessibility of source code.
High transparency in code review processes.
Strong community participation in development.

Areas for improvement:

Formal governance documentation and transparency in decision-making processes.
Economic transparency and accessibility of financial information.
Development of a public long-term roadmap.
Clearer definition of control and balance mechanisms in governance.

The score of 47.06/100 reflects elementary OS's mixed approach to transparency and openness. While it performs exceptionally well in areas related to technical development and community involvement, there are significant areas for improvement, particularly in formal governance documentation and economic transparency.

It's important to note that elementary OS, as a project focused on design and user experience, may prioritize these aspects over formal governance structures and financial transparency. The project's emphasis on creating a cohesive and polished desktop environment may sometimes take precedence over these aspects, which is reflected in this evaluation.

End